Peter Lotz

65 papers receiving 787 citations

Peers

Peter Lotz
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Biomedical Engineering 485
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 64
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 39
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 97
  • Emergency Medicine 34
Replace Sandra Winkler with:
Sandra Winkler United States
James I. Novak Australia
Joseph B. Webster United States
Luca Ricciardi Italy
A. Bolz Germany
Curtis Lee United States
Wilson Greatbatch United States
Alan Turner‐Smith United Kingdom
Frank R. Wilson Canada
Gang Yang China
Peter Lotz relative to Sandra Winkler United States Sandra Winkler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.8×
Sandra Winkler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Lotz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Lotz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Lotz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Lotz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Lotz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Lotz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Lotz. The network helps show where Peter Lotz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Lotz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Lotz Line = papers co-authored together Peter Lotz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011157
2 198797
3 200563
4 200958
5 200944
6 200931
7 200929
8 200929
9 201029
10 201127
11 201125
12 200824
13 200824
14 196819
15
[The effect of intraoperative PEEP ventilation and postoperative CPAP breathing on postoperative lung function following upper abdominal surgery].
198413
16 201110
17 19939
18 20119
19 19798
20 19837

About Peter Lotz

Peter Lotz is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Economics and Econometrics, Emergency Medicine and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 68 papers that have together received 829 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (15 papers), Dielectric materials and actuators (14 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (11 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (8 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (6 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (5 papers), Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials (5 papers) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomedical Engineering (485 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (64 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (39 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (97 citations) and Emergency Medicine (34 citations). Peter Lotz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include Helmut F. Schlaak, Marc Matysek, Friedrich Wilhelm Ahnefeld, Karl H. Lindner, Francesco Lissoni, Jens Schovsbo, Lee N. Davis, W. Dick, D. Brokken and A. Grünert. Their work appears in journals such as European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Resuscitation, Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology and IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact