Peter Lincoln

880 citations
19 papers · 336 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Lincoln

16 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

Peter Lincoln
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Human-Computer Interaction 146
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 63
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 215
  • Media Technology 59
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 47
Replace Christian Spagno with:
Christian Spagno Switzerland
Kai Strehlke United States
Youichi Horry Japan
Masayuki Nakajima Japan
Dave Pape United States
Sebastian Friston United Kingdom
M. Masry United States
Behzad Sajadi United States
Yen-Chen Lin United States
Oleg Alexander United States
Peter Lincoln relative to Christian Spagno Switzerland Christian Spagno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Christian Spagno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Lincoln

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Lincoln's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Lincoln with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Lincoln more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Lincoln

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Lincoln. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Lincoln. The network helps show where Peter Lincoln may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Lincoln, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Lincoln Line = papers co-authored together Peter Lincoln links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201672
2 201866
3 201446
4 200940
5 201021
6 201817
7 200712
8 201112
9 200911
10 201210
11 20179
12
Dual-Lingualism: Passive Bilingualism in Action
19799
13 19763
14 20123
15 19732
16 20192
17
Surface Projection Method for Visualizing Volumetric Data
20061
18 19770
19
Multi-view lenticular display for group teleconferencing
20100

About Peter Lincoln

Peter Lincoln is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, Media Technology, Language and Linguistics and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, having authored 19 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interactive and Immersive Displays (7 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (7 papers), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (5 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (4 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (3 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (3 papers), Human Motion and Animation (2 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (146 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (63 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (215 citations), Media Technology (59 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (47 citations). Peter Lincoln has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Henry Fuchs, Andrei State, Turner Whitted, Greg Welch, Anselmo Lastra, Montek Singh, Adrian Ilie, Andrew Maimone, Feng Zheng and Shahram Izadi. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Graphics, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Virtual Reality, Orbis Litterarum and Journal of Japanese Linguistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact