Peter Kroes

2.6k citations
86 papers · 1.9k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Kroes

81 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Peter Kroes
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • History and Philosophy of Science 236
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 419
  • Safety Research 166
  • Human-Computer Interaction 113
  • Information Systems and Management 132
Replace Evan Selinger with:
Evan Selinger United States
Pieter E. Vermaas Netherlands
Wybo Houkes Netherlands
Ronald R. Kline United States
Lorenzo Magnani Italy
Stephen B. Miles United States
Fernando Flores Argentina
John J. Clement United States
Gilbert Simondon Spain
Pamela McCorduck United States
Peter Kroes relative to Evan Selinger United States Evan Selinger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Evan Selinger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Kroes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Kroes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Kroes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Kroes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Kroes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Kroes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Kroes. The network helps show where Peter Kroes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Peter Kroes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Kroes Line = papers co-authored together Peter Kroes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006173
2 2002129
3 2006109
4 2006103
5 2012101
6 201195
7
The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology
200094
8 201480
9 200764
10 201161
11 201357
12 201053
13 200952
14 199250
15 200948
16 201644
17 198940
18 199838
19 201435
20 200631

About Peter Kroes

Peter Kroes is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science, Mechanical Engineering, Sociology and Political Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 86 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Design Education and Practice (16 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (14 papers), Cognitive Science and Education Research (12 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (7 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (6 papers), Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (5 papers) and Information Systems Theories and Implementation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (236 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (419 citations), Safety Research (166 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (113 citations) and Information Systems and Management (132 citations). Peter Kroes has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Anthonie Meijers, Maarten Franssen, Ibo van de Poel, Pieter E. Vermaas, Peter‐Paul Verbeek, Wybo Houkes, Per Galle, Steven A. Moore, Andrew Light and Philip J. Nickel. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Design Studies, Synthese, Philosophy of Science and Housing Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact