Peter Kroes

2.7k citations
94 papers · 1.9k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Kroes

89 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Peter Kroes
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • History and Philosophy of Science 519
  • General Social Sciences 166
  • Philosophy 297
  • Safety Research 182
  • Human-Computer Interaction 98
Replace Pieter E. Vermaas with:
Pieter E. Vermaas Netherlands
Wybo Houkes Netherlands
Maarten Franssen Netherlands
Evan M. Selinger United States
Simon Penny United States
Steven Louis Goldman United States
Philip A. E. Brey Netherlands
Gilbert Simondon France
Alex Roland United States
Marc J. de Vries Netherlands
Peter Kroes relative to Pieter E. Vermaas Netherlands Pieter E. Vermaas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Pieter E. Vermaas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Kroes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Kroes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Kroes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Kroes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Kroes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Kroes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Kroes. The network helps show where Peter Kroes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Peter Kroes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Kroes Line = papers co-authored together Peter Kroes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006169
2 2002127
3 2006109
4 2006102
5 201299
6 201196
7
The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology
200092
8 201477
9 200764
10 201163
11 201357
12 201055
13 200954
14 199249
15 200949
16 201643
17 200641
18 198939
19 199839
20 201438

About Peter Kroes

Peter Kroes is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, General Social Sciences, Philosophy, Mechanical Engineering and Architecture, having authored 94 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (31 papers), Cybernetics and Technology in Society (26 papers), Design Education and Practice (23 papers), Philosophical Thought and Analysis (16 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (10 papers), History of Science and Medicine (10 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (8 papers) and Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (519 citations), General Social Sciences (166 citations), Philosophy (297 citations), Safety Research (182 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (98 citations). Peter Kroes has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anthonie W. M. Meijers, Maarten Franssen, Ibo van de Poel, Pieter E. Vermaas, Peter‐Paul Verbeek, Wybo Houkes, Per Galle, Steven A. Moore, Andrew Light and Philip J. Nickel. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Design Studies, Synthese, Philosophy of Science and Science and Engineering Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact