Peter Kraker

886 citations
40 papers · 399 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Kraker

35 papers receiving 360 citations

Peers

Peter Kraker
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 142
  • Information Systems and Management 116
  • Information Systems 188
  • Communication 36
  • History and Philosophy of Science 20
Replace Stacy Konkiel with:
Stacy Konkiel United States
Yassine Gargouri Canada
Damon McDougall United States
Kaitlin Thaney United States
Amye Kenall Germany
C. Sean Burns United States
Lisa Christian United States
Andrew Updegrove United States
Ryan Chute United States
Jihyun Kim South Korea
Peter Kraker relative to Stacy Konkiel United States Stacy Konkiel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Stacy Konkiel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Kraker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Kraker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Kraker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Kraker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Kraker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Kraker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Kraker. The network helps show where Peter Kraker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Kraker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Kraker Line = papers co-authored together Peter Kraker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201698
2 201454
3 201136
4 201732
5 201531
6 201618
7 201515
8 201613
9 202113
10 201213
11 20239
12 20217
13 20196
14
The ResearchGate Score: a good example of a bad metric
20156
15 20155
16 20134
17 20144
18 20194
19 20173
20 20133

About Peter Kraker

Peter Kraker is a scholar working on Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Sociology and Political Science and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 40 papers that have together received 399 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Research Data Management Practices (12 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (11 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (7 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (5 papers), Data Quality and Management (5 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (5 papers), Libraries and Information Services (4 papers) and Web visibility and informetrics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (142 citations), Information Systems and Management (116 citations), Information Systems (188 citations), Communication (36 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (20 citations). Peter Kraker has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Elisabeth Lex, Christian Gumpenberger, Juan Gorraiz, Isabella Peters, Kris Jack, Christian Schlögl, Derick Leony, Wolfgang Reinhardt, Stefanie Lindstaedt and Michael Granitzer. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, Scientometrics, Data Science Journal, NeoBiota and Journal of Informetrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact