Peter Knauth

109 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Peter Knauth
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.7k
  • Occupational Therapy 214
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 341
  • Social Psychology 630
  • General Health Professions 606
Replace Cláudia Roberta de Castro Moreno with:
Cláudia Roberta de Castro Moreno Brazil
Akinori Nakata Japan
Frida Marina Fischer Brazil
Lee Di Milia Australia
Roger Persson Sweden
Brian Boehlecke United States
Paola Ferri Italy
Stephen L. Brown United Kingdom
Lisa Dorn United Kingdom
Naomi G. Swanson United States
Peter Knauth relative to Cláudia Roberta de Castro Moreno Brazil Cláudia Roberta de Castro Moreno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Cláudia Roberta de Castro Moreno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Knauth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Knauth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Knauth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Knauth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Knauth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Knauth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Knauth. The network helps show where Peter Knauth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Knauth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Knauth Line = papers co-authored together Peter Knauth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003150
2 1977147
3 1993135
4 1976127
5 1980107
6 1988107
7 199698
8 198098
9 200776
10 200867
11
Shiftwork : problems and solutions
199666
12 198862
13 197856
14 200054
15 202150
16
Development of criteria for the design of shiftwork systems.
198249
17 200548
18 197646
19 197546
20 199544

About Peter Knauth

Peter Knauth is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials, having authored 112 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (47 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (20 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (16 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (5 papers), Maritime Navigation and Safety (5 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (5 papers), Sleep and related disorders (5 papers) and Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.7k citations), Occupational Therapy (214 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (341 citations), Social Psychology (630 citations) and General Health Professions (606 citations). Peter Knauth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Mexico and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. Rutenfranz, Juhani Ilmarinen, Mikko Härmä, W. P. Colquhoun, Timothy H. Monk, J Ghata, Simon Folkard, Otto Hänninen, Ernst Kiesswetter and Zaira López. Their work appears in journals such as International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, Ergonomics, Applied Ergonomics, Chronobiology International and Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact