Peter Knauth

123 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Peter Knauth
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.8k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 383
  • Occupational Therapy 232
  • Social Psychology 694
  • General Health Professions 663
Replace Cláudia Roberta de Castro Moreno with:
Cláudia Roberta de Castro Moreno Brazil
Frida Marina Fischer Brazil
Lee V. Di Milia Australia
Kazutaka Kogi Japan
Tadeusz Marek Poland
Roger Persson Sweden
Jong‐Min Woo South Korea
Thomas C. Erren Germany
Anne Richter Sweden
Peter Knauth relative to Cláudia Roberta de Castro Moreno Brazil Cláudia Roberta de Castro Moreno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Cláudia Roberta de Castro Moreno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Knauth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Knauth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Knauth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Knauth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Knauth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Knauth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Knauth. The network helps show where Peter Knauth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Knauth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Knauth Line = papers co-authored together Peter Knauth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 129 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003162
2 1977154
3 1993146
4 1976141
5 1980117
6 1988109
7 1980109
8 1996105
9 200786
10
Shiftwork : problems and solutions
199674
11 200874
12 198864
13 197564
14 197858
15 202156
16 200056
17
Development of criteria for the design of shiftwork systems.
198251
18 199551
19 199750
20 197649

About Peter Knauth

Peter Knauth is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Occupational Therapy, having authored 129 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (51 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (20 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (16 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (7 papers), Sleep and related disorders (6 papers), Corporate Governance and Management (6 papers), Corporate Management and Leadership (5 papers) and Maritime Navigation and Safety (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.8k citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (383 citations), Occupational Therapy (232 citations), Social Psychology (694 citations) and General Health Professions (663 citations). Peter Knauth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Mexico and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. Rutenfranz, Juhani Ilmarinen, Mikko I. Härmä, W. P. Colquhoun, Timothy H. Monk, Simon Folkard, Jean Ghata, Otto Hänninen, Zaira López and Ernst Kiesswetter. Their work appears in journals such as International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, Ergonomics, Chronobiology International, Applied Ergonomics and Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact