Peter King

62.1k citations
104 papers · 1.5k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Peter King

93 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Peter King
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • History 195
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 344
  • Economics and Econometrics 260
  • Anthropology 78
  • Genetics 225
Replace Margaret C. Nelson with:
Margaret C. Nelson United States
Alan R. H. Baker United States
Joaquim Fort Spain
Patrick Roberts Germany
John Beatty United States
Walter Johnson United States
Ann Gibbons United Kingdom
Suzanne Romaine United States
James F. O’Connell United States
John Edward Gray United States
Peter King relative to Margaret C. Nelson United States Margaret C. Nelson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Margaret C. Nelson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter King. The network helps show where Peter King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter King Line = papers co-authored together Peter King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 104 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012125
2 199892
3 200090
4 199780
5 199777
6 199355
7 200154
8 198453
9 199551
10 200846
11 201845
12 198845
13 199139
14 199830
15 201229
16 198928
17 199125
18 200622
19 199620
20 195320

About Peter King

Peter King is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Political Science and International Relations and Anthropology, having authored 104 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (18 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (8 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (6 papers), Australian History and Society (5 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers) and Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (195 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (344 citations), Economics and Econometrics (260 citations), Anthropology (78 citations) and Genetics (225 citations). Peter King has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include James Mallet, R. L. Savage, Martyn Poliakoff, B. Willke, W. Owen McMillan, Chris D. Jiggins, Robert L. Byer, David Bancroft, Josephine M. Pemberton and David G. Heckel. Their work appears in journals such as Heredity, Continuity and Change, Past & Present, Optics Letters and The Economic History Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact