John Beatty

3.1k citations
36 papers · 1.6k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

John Beatty

36 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

John Beatty
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • History and Philosophy of Science 761
  • General Decision Sciences 43
  • Genetics 411
  • Sociology and Political Science 594
  • General Psychology 16
Replace Michael Weisberg with:
Michael Weisberg United States
Hugh Lehman Canada
Peter Machamer United States
Deborah G. Mayo United States
Peter Lipton United Kingdom
Samir Okasha United Kingdom
Harold Kincaid United States
William C. Wimsatt United States
James Woodward United States
Margaret Morrison Canada
John Beatty relative to Michael Weisberg United States Michael Weisberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Michael Weisberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Beatty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Beatty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Beatty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Beatty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Beatty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Beatty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Beatty. The network helps show where John Beatty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside John Beatty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Beatty Line = papers co-authored together John Beatty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989370
2 1979245
3 2006107
4 198495
5 198091
6 199787
7 198077
8 199463
9 201051
10 200643
11 200639
12 198734
13 198430
14 200629
15 201729
16 201626
17 199322
18 200920
19 201620
20 201117

About John Beatty

John Beatty is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Genetics, Political Science and International Relations and Philosophy, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (15 papers), Evolution and Science Education (10 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (8 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (5 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (2 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (1 paper) and Twentieth Century Scientific Developments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (761 citations), General Decision Sciences (43 citations), Genetics (411 citations), Sociology and Political Science (594 citations) and General Psychology (16 citations). John Beatty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Theodore M. Porter, Gerd Gigerenzer, Lorenz Krüger, Lorraine Daston, Zeno G. Swijtink, Alfred Moore, Robert N. Brandon, Elliott Sober, William L. Fink and James P. Collins. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Journal of the History of Biology, Biology & Philosophy, Episteme and Journal of the Philosophy of History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact