Peter King

63.6k citations
130 papers · 1.9k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Peter King

113 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Peter King
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
  • History 307
  • Economics and Econometrics 403
  • Anthropology 131
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 356
  • History and Philosophy of Science 52
Replace Alan R. H. Baker with:
Alan R. H. Baker United States
Peter Münz Switzerland
Edward Friedman United States
Galileo Galilei United States
Jürgen Renn Germany
J. L. Heilbron United States
John Wilkins Australia
Martin Kemp United Kingdom
Suzanne Romaine United States
Ernán McMullin United States
Peter King relative to Alan R. H. Baker United States Alan R. H. Baker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Alan R. H. Baker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter King. The network helps show where Peter King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter King Line = papers co-authored together Peter King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 130 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012131
2 2000118
3 199894
4 199782
5 199778
6 199560
7 198458
8 199356
9 200154
10 198854
11 201847
12 200847
13 198943
14 199143
15 199142
16 199742
17 199539
18 199836
19 201234
20 200629

About Peter King

Peter King is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 130 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (30 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (15 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (10 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (9 papers), Australian History and Society (7 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (6 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (307 citations), Economics and Econometrics (403 citations), Anthropology (131 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (356 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (52 citations). Peter King has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include James Mallet, B. Willke, Martyn Poliakoff, R. L. Savage, Chris D. Jiggins, W. Owen McMillan, David Bancroft, Josephine M. Pemberton, Robert L. Byer and Chris D. Thomas. Their work appears in journals such as Heredity, Past & Present, Continuity and Change, Optics Letters and The Economic History Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact