Peter Kerr

939 citations
42 papers · 515 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Kerr

37 papers receiving 456 citations

Peers

Peter Kerr
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Political Science and International Relations 290
  • Public Administration 32
  • Finance 68
  • Gender Studies 49
  • Sociology and Political Science 158
Replace Thomas Frank with:
Thomas Frank Italy
David Jacobs United States
André Singer Brazil
Alex Demirović Germany
M.C. 't Hart Netherlands
Sudhir Hazareesingh United Kingdom
Sujata Patel India
Barbara Ransby United States
Jeffrey Butler Germany
Drew Whitelegg United Kingdom
Peter Kerr relative to Thomas Frank Italy Thomas Frank's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×35×
Thomas Frank · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Kerr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Kerr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Kerr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Kerr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Kerr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Kerr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Kerr. The network helps show where Peter Kerr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Peter Kerr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Kerr Line = papers co-authored together Peter Kerr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200259
2 201252
3 201141
4 201440
5 202133
6 201233
7
Postwar British Politics: From Conflict to Consensus
200133
8 200632
9
The crystal structures of ordered and disordered cobaltite
196526
10 200721
11 201520
12 201917
13 196312
14 201012
15 202110
16 201210
17 20189
18 20248
19 20086
20 20145

About Peter Kerr

Peter Kerr is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Finance, General Health Professions and Geophysics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 515 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political and Economic history of UK and US (16 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (9 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (5 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (4 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (2 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (2 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Challenges (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (290 citations), Public Administration (32 citations), Finance (68 citations), Gender Studies (49 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (158 citations). Peter Kerr has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Byrne, Steven Kettell, Emma Foster, Stephen Bates, R. F. Giese, Liam Stanley, Richard Hayton, Linda Åhäll, William A. Bassett and O. A. Schaeffer. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, British Politics, Parliamentary Affairs, Geological Society of America Bulletin and Political Studies Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact