Peter Jantscheff

40 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Peter Jantscheff
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Endocrinology 147
  • Oncology 294
  • Immunology 205
  • Genetics 278
  • Immunology and Allergy 51
Replace Ping Tsui with:
Ping Tsui United States
Seán O. Hynes Ireland
Ragnar Lindstedt Italy
Colette Jolivet‐Reynaud France
Kazuhisa Sugimura Japan
Sylvie Rouyre France
J. J. M. Onderwater Netherlands
Yanbing Ma China
Bei Wang China
Halina Miller‐Podraza Sweden
Peter Jantscheff relative to Ping Tsui United States Ping Tsui's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Ping Tsui · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Jantscheff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Jantscheff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Jantscheff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Jantscheff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Jantscheff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Jantscheff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Jantscheff. The network helps show where Peter Jantscheff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Jantscheff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Jantscheff Line = papers co-authored together Peter Jantscheff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007477
2 2003139
3 200762
4 201562
5 200956
6 201147
7 200043
8 199337
9 199637
10 200234
11 200733
12 200230
13 200930
14 200928
15 200227
16 200823
17 199323
18 200723
19 200022
20 199921

About Peter Jantscheff

Peter Jantscheff is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Oncology, Genetics and Immunology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virus-based gene therapy research (10 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (9 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (7 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (6 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (6 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (6 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (6 papers) and Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (147 citations), Oncology (294 citations), Immunology (205 citations), Genetics (278 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (51 citations). Peter Jantscheff has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and France. Frequent co-authors include Ulrich Massing, Jean‐Frédéric Colombel, Harald Peeters, Frédéric A. Carvalho, Nicolas Barnich, Anne-Lise Glasser, Gilles Bommelaer, Arlette Darfeuille–Michaud, Claude Darcha and Pierre Desreumaux. Their work appears in journals such as Cancers, Journal of Leukocyte Biology, Cancer Gene Therapy, International Journal of Cancer and Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact