Peter J. Mark

65 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Peter J. Mark
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 320
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 495
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 663
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 379
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 57
Replace Denise S. Fernandez‐Twinn with:
Denise S. Fernandez‐Twinn United Kingdom
Olaf Uhl Germany
Brigitte Reusens Belgium
Malgorzata S. Martin‐Gronert United Kingdom
Ina Knerr Germany
Bertrand Blondeau France
Kaiping Yang Canada
Clint L. Gray New Zealand
Cun Li United States
Adele Noble United States
Peter J. Mark relative to Denise S. Fernandez‐Twinn United Kingdom Denise S. Fernandez‐Twinn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.1×
Denise S. Fernandez‐Twinn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Mark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Mark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Mark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Mark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Mark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Mark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Mark. The network helps show where Peter J. Mark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Mark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Mark Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Mark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993173
2 2006110
3 2014108
4 2005102
5 201691
6 201490
7 201088
8 201788
9 200783
10 200982
11 201276
12 199969
13 201269
14 201969
15 200168
16 201266
17 201164
18 200259
19 200657
20 201056

About Peter J. Mark

Peter J. Mark is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Nutrition and Dietetics and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 66 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (16 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (15 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (15 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (5 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (5 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (5 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (2 papers) and Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (320 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (495 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (663 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (379 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (57 citations). Peter J. Mark has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Brendan J. Waddell, Caitlin S. Wyrwoll, Jeffrey A. Keelan, B. J. Waddell, Trevor Anthony Mori, Megan L. Jones, Rachael C. Crew, Irving L.M.H. Aye, Thomas Ratajczak and Bryan K. Ward. Their work appears in journals such as Biology of Reproduction, Placenta, Endocrinology, Journal of Endocrinology and Reproduction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact