Peter Igelmund

759 citations
21 papers · 659 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Igelmund

21 papers receiving 640 citations

Peers

Peter Igelmund
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 395
  • Developmental Neuroscience 30
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 42
  • Neurology 34
  • Sensory Systems 19
Replace Dennis G. Emery with:
Dennis G. Emery United States
M. D�ring Germany
Lillian M. Pubols United States
Jean‐François Pflieger Canada
Louis A. Ritz United States
Wilfried Schober Germany
Mischa Vance Bandet Canada
Rüdiger Linke Germany
K. Saini Switzerland
Rena Orman United States
Peter Igelmund relative to Dennis G. Emery United States Dennis G. Emery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Dennis G. Emery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Igelmund

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Igelmund's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Igelmund with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Igelmund more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Igelmund

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Igelmund. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Igelmund. The network helps show where Peter Igelmund may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Igelmund, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Igelmund Line = papers co-authored together Peter Igelmund links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199388
2 199956
3 198756
4 200753
5 199748
6 200948
7 199044
8 200941
9 199636
10 199833
11 199121
12 199119
13 199919
14 199516
15 199616
16 199515
17 200213
18 199512
19 199512
20 20099

About Peter Igelmund

Peter Igelmund is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Genetics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 659 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (4 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (3 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (395 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (30 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (42 citations), Neurology (34 citations) and Sensory Systems (19 citations). Peter Igelmund has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Uwe Heinemann, Juergen Hescheler, Jasmine Stabel, Uwe Heinemann, Andreas Leschinger, Gernot Wendler, Toni Schneider, Holger Spangenberger, Günther Rausche and Yuqian Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, Journal of Comparative Physiology A, Experimental Brain Research, Trends in Pharmacological Sciences and Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact