Peter Hofmann

864 citations
46 papers · 632 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Hofmann

38 papers receiving 600 citations

Peers

Peter Hofmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 266
  • Automotive Engineering 265
  • Computational Mechanics 148
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 19
  • Materials Chemistry 184
Replace Changwei Ji with:
Changwei Ji China
Yan Tan China
Jincheng Huang China
Weiwei Han China
Shuzhan Bai China
Thomas Lauer Austria
G. Amba Prasad Rao India
Junghwan Kim South Korea
F.N. Alasfour Kuwait
Abdul Rafeq Saleman Malaysia
Peter Hofmann relative to Changwei Ji China Changwei Ji's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Changwei Ji · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Hofmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Hofmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Hofmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Hofmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Hofmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Hofmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Hofmann. The network helps show where Peter Hofmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Hofmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Hofmann Line = papers co-authored together Peter Hofmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202075
2 201074
3 200570
4 200956
5 201751
6 201837
7 201634
8 201628
9 201426
10 201022
11 202418
12 199515
13 201612
14 201412
15 202111
16 199711
17 20179
18 20199
19 20168
20 20157

About Peter Hofmann

Peter Hofmann is a scholar working on Automotive Engineering, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computational Mechanics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 46 papers that have together received 632 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (19 papers), Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies (17 papers), Advanced Battery Technologies Research (12 papers), Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure (10 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (9 papers), Biodiesel Production and Applications (7 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (6 papers) and Fuel Cells and Related Materials (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (266 citations), Automotive Engineering (265 citations), Computational Mechanics (148 citations), Energy Engineering and Power Technology (19 citations) and Materials Chemistry (184 citations). Peter Hofmann has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Bernhard Geringer, Erich Knözinger, Oliver Diwald, John Williams, Slavica Stankic, Volker Uhlenwinkel, Nils Ellendt, Johannes Bernardi, Martin Sterrer and Jürgen Willand. Their work appears in journals such as SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, MTZ - Motortechnische Zeitschrift, Powder Metallurgy and Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact