Peter Hekman
Impact in
-
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Small Animals top 5%
- Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Papers in
-
- Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy 5
- Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism 3
-
- Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia 3
- Co-authors
- Cees A.M. van Ginneken (6 shared papers)Jacques F. M. Nouws (2 shared papers)Harry A. Kuiper (1 shared paper)Laurentius A. P. Hoogenboom (1 shared paper)Frans G. M. Rüssel (2 shared papers)Alfons C. Wouterse (1 shared paper)Ronette Gehring (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Veterinary Quarterly (2 papers)Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics (1 paper)EFSA Journal (1 paper)British Poultry Science (1 paper)Xenobiotica (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsIsrael
In The Last Decade
Peter Hekman
13 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 109
- Small Animals 73
- Molecular Medicine 54
- Animal Science and Zoology 48
- Food Science 77
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Hekman
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Hekman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Hekman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Hekman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Hekman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Hekman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Hekman. The network helps show where Peter Hekman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Peter Hekman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 261 | |
| 2 | 1982 | 28 | |
| 3 | 1987 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 5 | 1982 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1987 | 15 | |
| 7 | 1980 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1982 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1980 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1986 | 1 |
About Peter Hekman
Peter Hekman is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Small Animals, Pharmacology, Food Science and Oncology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (5 papers), Agricultural safety and regulations (3 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (3 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (3 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (3 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (2 papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (2 papers) and Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (109 citations), Small Animals (73 citations), Molecular Medicine (54 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (48 citations) and Food Science (77 citations). Peter Hekman has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Cees A.M. van Ginneken, Jacques F. M. Nouws, Harry A. Kuiper, Laurentius A. P. Hoogenboom, Frans G. M. Rüssel, Alfons C. Wouterse and Ronette Gehring. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Quarterly, Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, EFSA Journal, British Poultry Science and Xenobiotica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.