Peter Gröpel

50 papers receiving 985 citations

Peers

Peter Gröpel
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Applied Psychology 209
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 271
  • Social Psychology 332
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 113
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 134
Replace Reinhard Stelter with:
Reinhard Stelter Denmark
Patricia C. Jackman United Kingdom
Pierre‐Nicolas Lemyre Norway
Claude Ferrand France
Amber D. Mosewich Canada
Kate F. Hays United Kingdom
Sandrine Isoard‐Gautheur France
Francisco L. Atienza Spain
Emma Guillet‐Descas France
Sandra E. Moritz United States
Peter Gröpel relative to Reinhard Stelter Denmark Reinhard Stelter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Reinhard Stelter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Gröpel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Gröpel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Gröpel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Gröpel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Gröpel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Gröpel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Gröpel. The network helps show where Peter Gröpel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Gröpel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Gröpel Line = papers co-authored together Peter Gröpel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008151
2 201796
3 200881
4 201270
5 201469
6 201658
7 201935
8 201633
9 201532
10 201830
11 200627
12 201626
13 201924
14 202124
15 202124
16 201320
17 201519
18 202018
19 201814
20 202214

About Peter Gröpel

Peter Gröpel is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (12 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (12 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Sports Performance and Training (6 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (4 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (4 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (209 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (271 citations), Social Psychology (332 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (113 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (134 citations). Peter Gröpel has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jürgen Beckmann, Julius Kühl, Christopher Mesagno, Piers Steel, Felix Ehrlenspiel, Roy F. Baumeister, Kai Chen, Mirko Wegner, H. M. Kehr and M. Wagner. Their work appears in journals such as Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology, Psychology of sport and exercise, Frontiers in Pediatrics, Pediatric Research and International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact