Peter Glasner

43 papers receiving 511 citations

Peers

Peter Glasner
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Physiology 196
  • Reproductive Medicine 64
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 124
  • Health 30
  • Geography, Planning and Development 23
Replace Ruha Benjamin with:
Ruha Benjamin United States
N. Derek Brown United States
Deborah Heath United States
Andrew Balmer United Kingdom
Kimberly TallBear United States
Janet L. Dolgin United States
Kalindi Vora United States
Regula Valérie Burri Germany
Joan Haran United Kingdom
Deryck Beyleveld United Kingdom
Peter Glasner relative to Ruha Benjamin United States Ruha Benjamin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Ruha Benjamin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Glasner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Glasner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Glasner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Glasner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Glasner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Glasner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Glasner. The network helps show where Peter Glasner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Peter Glasner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Glasner Line = papers co-authored together Peter Glasner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200667
2 199855
3
Local Cells, Global Science: The Rise of Embryonic Stem Cell Research in India
200853
4 200836
5 200831
6 200626
7 200524
8 201123
9 201322
10 200220
11 201318
12 199616
13 197815
14
Genetic Imaginations: Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in Human Genome Research
199814
15 200813
16 197813
17 200913
18 200612
19 200110
20 20119

About Peter Glasner

Peter Glasner is a scholar working on Physiology, Molecular Biology, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 49 papers that have together received 580 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (15 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (7 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (7 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (5 papers), Biotechnology and Related Fields (5 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (5 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (3 papers) and German Literature and Culture Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (196 citations), Reproductive Medicine (64 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (124 citations), Health (30 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (23 citations). Peter Glasner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Paul Atkinson, Neil Stephens, Aditya Bharadwaj, David Dunkerley, Harry Rothman, Phillip E. Hammond, Ruth A. Wallace, Ruth McNally, Paul Atkinson and William B. Silverman. Their work appears in journals such as New Genetics and Society, Health Sociology Review, Health Risk & Society, Science as Culture and Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact