Science and Public Policy

2.2k papers and 35.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Science and Public Policy in the last decades have received a total of 35.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Science and Public Policy usually cover Economics and Econometrics (641 papers), Political Science and International Relations (488 papers) and Management of Technology and Innovation (406 papers) specifically the topics of Innovation Policy and R&D (433 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (230 papers) and University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (201 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Science and Public Policy are Henry Etzkowitz, Loet Leydesdorff, George Godber, Helga Nowotny, Jack Stilgoe, Phil Macnaghten, Richard Owen, Peter Weingart, Daniele Archibugi and Sheila Jasanoff.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Science and Public Policy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Science and Public Policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Science and Public Policy.

Countries where authors publish in Science and Public Policy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Science and Public Policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Science and Public Policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Science and Public Policy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025