Peter Gee

26 papers receiving 606 citations

Peers

Peter Gee
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 153
  • Family Practice 60
  • Internal Medicine 26
  • General Health Professions 99
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 43
Replace Michael Twigg with:
Michael Twigg United Kingdom
Gudrun Theile Germany
Carolina J. P. W. Keijsers Netherlands
Melinda Orr United States
Deanne L. Hall United States
Andrew Gilbert Australia
Robert D. Sheeler United States
Hind Almodaimegh Saudi Arabia
Bella H. Mehta United States
Korey A. Kennelty United States
Peter Gee relative to Michael Twigg United Kingdom Michael Twigg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Michael Twigg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Gee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Gee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Gee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Gee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Gee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Gee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Gee. The network helps show where Peter Gee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Gee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Gee Line = papers co-authored together Peter Gee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201477
2 200974
3 201874
4 200956
5 200848
6 201847
7 200835
8 201133
9 201827
10 201625
11 201322
12 201519
13 201018
14
Development and evaluation of a computer-assisted instruction package in clinical pharmacology for nursing students.
199816
15 201614
16 202010
17 20238
18 20134
19 20174
20
Facilitating quality use of medicines between hospital and community (Med-E-Support)
20074

About Peter Gee

Peter Gee is a scholar working on Physiology, Infectious Diseases, Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions and Family Practice, having authored 26 papers that have together received 627 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (3 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (3 papers), HIV-related health complications and treatments (2 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs (1 paper) and HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (153 citations), Family Practice (60 citations), Internal Medicine (26 citations), General Health Professions (99 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (43 citations). Peter Gee has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and Ethiopia. Frequent co-authors include Gregory M. Peterson, SL Jackson, Juanita Westbury, Gregory M. Peterson, BJ Bereznicki, Lre Bereznicki, E. Haydn Walters, Ivan Bindoff, Woldesellassie M. Bezabhe and Leanne Chalmers. Their work appears in journals such as International Psychogeriatrics, The Medical Journal of Australia, JMIR Serious Games, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care and Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact