Peter Gacesa

2.3k citations
73 papers · 2.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Gacesa

72 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Peter Gacesa
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Aquatic Science 637
  • Biotechnology 588
  • Molecular Medicine 166
  • Molecular Biology 1.0k
  • Food Science 255
Replace G Espín with:
G Espín Mexico
Anne Tøndervik Norway
Arsénio M. Fialho Portugal
Hailun He China
Simon F.R. Hinkley New Zealand
Jae Kweon Park South Korea
Mei Qin Shi China
Shujun Wang China
Govindan Ramachandran India
Uwe Remminghorst New Zealand
Peter Gacesa relative to G Espín Mexico G Espín's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
G Espín · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Gacesa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Gacesa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Gacesa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Gacesa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Gacesa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Gacesa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Gacesa. The network helps show where Peter Gacesa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Gacesa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Gacesa Line = papers co-authored together Peter Gacesa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988469
2 1987180
3 1992178
4 1994159
5 1998159
6 1984105
7 198868
8 199067
9 198352
10 200151
11 198945
12 199444
13 199040
14 198137
15 199435
16 198929
17 198619
18 199418
19 199318
20 199117

About Peter Gacesa

Peter Gacesa is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Aquatic Science, Molecular Biology, Food Science and Cell Biology, having authored 73 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme Production and Characterization (20 papers), Polyamine Metabolism and Applications (14 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (13 papers), Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds (12 papers), Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (10 papers), Biopolymer Synthesis and Applications (9 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (7 papers) and Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (637 citations), Biotechnology (588 citations), Molecular Medicine (166 citations), Molecular Biology (1.0k citations) and Food Science (255 citations). Peter Gacesa has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas J. Russell, Frederick S. Wusteman, D. C. White, Anders Sonesson, Dennis E. Ohman, Chetan E. Chitnis, Michael John Franklin, Peter J. Tatnell, Anthony H. Olavesen and Richard C. Caswell. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Society Transactions, Carbohydrate Research, Biochemical Journal, Hydrobiologia and Gene.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact