Peter Gabel
Impact in
- Law top 0.5%
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Law in Society and Culture
- Legal principles and applications
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics
- International Law and Human Rights
Papers in
- Law 2
- Law in Society and Culture 2
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations 1
- Co-authors
- Ronald M. Dworkin (1 shared paper)Duncan Kennedy (1 shared paper)Rolf Burkhardt (1 shared paper)Franz Walter (1 shared paper)Rainer Henning (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Stanford Law Review (1 paper)Harvard Law Review (1 paper)Minnesota law review (1 paper)Pepperdine law review (1 paper)Research in Experimental Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
Peter Gabel
12 papers receiving 474 citations
Peter Gabel's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Law 215
- Political Science and International Relations 267
- Philosophy 93
- Public Administration 20
- Sociology and Political Science 212
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Gabel
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Gabel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Gabel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Gabel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Gabel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Gabel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Gabel. The network helps show where Peter Gabel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Peter Gabel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taking Rights Seriously Hit paper breakdown → | 1977 | 571 |
| 2 | 1984 | 73 | |
| 3 | 1977 | 11 | |
| 4 | Critical Legal Studies as a Spiritual Practice | 2009 | 6 |
| 5 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 7 | What it Really Means to Say "Law is Politics": Political History and Legal Argument in Bush v. Gore | 2002 | 2 |
| 8 | 1967 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 11 | The Desire for Mutual Recognition: Social Movements and the Dissolution of the False Self | 2018 | 1 |
| 12 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 0 |
About Peter Gabel
Peter Gabel is a scholar working on Law, General Materials Science, Urban Studies, Neurology and Archeology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 680 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Law in Society and Culture (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (1 paper), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (1 paper), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (1 paper), Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements (1 paper), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (1 paper) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (215 citations), Political Science and International Relations (267 citations), Philosophy (93 citations), Public Administration (20 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (212 citations). Peter Gabel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ronald M. Dworkin, Duncan Kennedy, Rolf Burkhardt, Franz Walter and Rainer Henning. Their work appears in journals such as Stanford Law Review, Harvard Law Review, Minnesota law review, Pepperdine law review and Research in Experimental Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.