Minnesota law review

1.0k papers and 4.5k indexed citations

About

The 1.0k papers published in Minnesota law review in the last decades have received a total of 4.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Minnesota law review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (405 papers), Law (332 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (231 papers) specifically the topics of Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (252 papers), Law, Rights, and Freedoms (140 papers) and Legal and Constitutional Studies (130 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Minnesota law review are Orly Lobel, Barry C. Feld, Bradley C. Karkkainen, David A. Harris, Carol M. Rose, Karl E. Klare, Brett M. Frischmann, Julie Roin, Timothy J. Muris and Joseph Raz.

In The Last Decade

Minnesota law review

521 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Minnesota law review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Minnesota law review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Minnesota law review.

Countries where authors publish in Minnesota law review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Minnesota law review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Minnesota law review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Minnesota law review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026