Minnesota law review

300 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 300 papers published in Minnesota law review in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Minnesota law review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (122 papers), Law (88 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (69 papers) specifically the topics of Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (73 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (41 papers) and Law, Rights, and Freedoms (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Minnesota law review are Barry C. Feld, Bradley C. Karkkainen, Carol M. Rose, Brett M. Frischmann, Steven L. Schwarcz, Daniel A. Farber, Pamela Samuelson, Robert Stewart, Christopher Uggen and David S. Law.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Minnesota law review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Minnesota law review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Minnesota law review.

Countries where authors publish in Minnesota law review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Minnesota law review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Minnesota law review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Minnesota law review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025