Peter Forbrig

1.3k citations
163 papers · 974 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Forbrig

148 papers receiving 903 citations

Peers

Peter Forbrig
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Human-Computer Interaction 497
  • Software 161
  • Management Information Systems 187
  • Information Systems 382
  • Development 58
Replace Víctor López‐Jaquero with:
Víctor López‐Jaquero Spain
Gaëlle Calvary France
Martijn van Welie Netherlands
Laurent Bouillon Belgium
David Thévenin France
Piyawadee Sukaviriya United States
François Bodart Belgium
Allen H. Dutoit Germany
Martin Hitz Austria
Steinar Kristoffersen Norway
Peter Forbrig relative to Víctor López‐Jaquero Spain Víctor López‐Jaquero's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Víctor López‐Jaquero · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Forbrig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Forbrig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Forbrig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Forbrig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Forbrig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Forbrig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Forbrig. The network helps show where Peter Forbrig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Forbrig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Forbrig Line = papers co-authored together Peter Forbrig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 163 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200336
2 200434
3 200632
4 200428
5 200126
6 200825
7 201422
8 200822
9 200721
10 200520
11 200720
12 201619
13 200518
14 200718
15 200217
16 200316
17 201615
18 201214
19 201014
20 200813

About Peter Forbrig

Peter Forbrig is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Information Systems, Software, Artificial Intelligence and Management Information Systems, having authored 163 papers that have together received 974 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Usability and User Interface Design (66 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (42 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (39 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (22 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (22 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (21 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (19 papers) and Software Engineering and Design Patterns (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (497 citations), Software (161 citations), Management Information Systems (187 citations), Information Systems (382 citations) and Development (58 citations). Peter Forbrig has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Anke Dittmar, Ahmed Seffah, D. Reichart, Ashraf Gaffar, Marco Winckler, Homa Javahery, Andreas Wolff, Regina Bernhaupt, Andreas Müller and Dietmar Rösner. Their work appears in journals such as Lecture notes in computer science, Journal of Systems and Software, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Advances in Engineering Software and Cognition Technology & Work.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact