Peter Forbrig

150 papers receiving 879 citations

Peers

Peter Forbrig
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Human-Computer Interaction 481
  • Software 209
  • Information Systems 265
  • Management Information Systems 113
  • Artificial Intelligence 205
Replace Víctor López‐Jaquero with:
Víctor López‐Jaquero Spain
Chris Roast United Kingdom
Quentin Limbourg Belgium
Laurent Bouillon Belgium
David Thévenin Japan
Gerrit Meixner Germany
Giulio Mori Italy
Jose Antonio Gallud Spain
José Creissac Campos Portugal
Jan Van den Bergh Belgium
Peter Forbrig relative to Víctor López‐Jaquero Spain Víctor López‐Jaquero's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.3×
Víctor López‐Jaquero · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Forbrig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Forbrig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Forbrig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Forbrig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Forbrig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Forbrig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Forbrig. The network helps show where Peter Forbrig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Forbrig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Forbrig Line = papers co-authored together Peter Forbrig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 160 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200336
2 200631
3 201428
4 200125
5 200825
6 200522
7 200722
8 200821
9 201621
10 200720
11 200718
12 200217
13 200517
14 200314
15 200714
16 201014
17 201214
18 201614
19 200813
20
A Concerted Model-driven and Pattern-based Framework for Developing User Interfaces of Interactive Ubiquitous Applications.
201513

About Peter Forbrig

Peter Forbrig is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Software, Information Systems, Management Information Systems and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 160 papers that have together received 944 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Usability and User Interface Design (79 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (48 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (34 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (32 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (25 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (16 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (13 papers) and Web Applications and Data Management (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (481 citations), Software (209 citations), Information Systems (265 citations), Management Information Systems (113 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (205 citations). Peter Forbrig has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Anke Dittmar, Ahmed Seffah, Daniel E. Reichart, Marco A. A. Winckler, Homa Javahery, Regina Bernhaupt, Andreas Wolff, Philippe A. Palanque, Ashraf Gaffar and Dietmar Rösner. Their work appears in journals such as Lecture notes in computer science, Journal of Systems and Software, Advances in Engineering Software, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction and Lecture notes in business information processing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact