Peter Enyong

80 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Peter Enyong
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Parasitology 774
  • Infectious Diseases 1.4k
  • Ecology 639
  • Insect Science 213
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 224
Replace Mark Bradley with:
Mark Bradley United Kingdom
Wilma A. Stolk Netherlands
Boakye A. Boatin United Kingdom
Paul E. Simonsen Denmark
Patrick J. Lammie United States
Mounkaïla Noma Burkina Faso
Reda M. R. Ramzy Egypt
Thomas G. Streit United States
Taniawati Supali Indonesia
Manuel Calvopiña Ecuador
Peter Enyong relative to Mark Bradley United Kingdom Mark Bradley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Mark Bradley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Enyong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Enyong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Enyong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Enyong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Enyong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Enyong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Enyong. The network helps show where Peter Enyong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Enyong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Enyong Line = papers co-authored together Peter Enyong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010108
2 2002103
3
Rapid assessment method for prevalence and intensity of Loa loa infection.
200288
4 200985
5
Quantitative diagnosis of Schistosoma infections by measurement of circulating antigens in serum and urine.
199484
6 199452
7 200451
8 201350
9 200048
10 200848
11 199846
12 201146
13 200345
14 201643
15 201542
16 201440
17 200239
18 201235
19 200633
20 200532

About Peter Enyong

Peter Enyong is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Parasitology, Ecology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment (63 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (22 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (19 papers), Insects and Parasite Interactions (14 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (6 papers), Malaria Research and Control (6 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (6 papers) and Helminth infection and control (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (774 citations), Infectious Diseases (1.4k citations), Ecology (639 citations), Insect Science (213 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (224 citations). Peter Enyong has collaborated with scholars based in Cameroon, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Samuel Wanji, Nicholas Tendongfor, Mathias Eyong Esum, Achim Hoerauf, Mark J. Taylor, Alfons Renz, J Remme, Jonas A. Kengne-Ouafo, G. Wahl and Sara Lustigman. Their work appears in journals such as Parasites & Vectors, American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, PLoS neglected tropical diseases, Parasite and Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact