Peter Enser

1.2k citations
28 papers · 940 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Enser

25 papers receiving 825 citations

Peers

Peter Enser
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 785
  • Library and Information Sciences 19
  • Museology 33
  • Signal Processing 76
  • Media Technology 45
Replace Gary Geisler with:
Gary Geisler United States
Rao Shen United States
Donato Pirozzi Italy
Sotiris Diplaris Greece
Paolo Federico Austria
Dimitrios Koukopoulos Greece
Trond Aalberg Norway
Vassilis Poulopoulos Greece
Alessandro Adamou United Kingdom
Marieke Guy United Kingdom
Peter Enser relative to Gary Geisler United States Gary Geisler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Gary Geisler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Enser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Enser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Enser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Enser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Enser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Enser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Enser. The network helps show where Peter Enser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Peter Enser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Enser Line = papers co-authored together Peter Enser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997206
2 1995154
3 2006124
4 200068
5 200352
6 200751
7 200846
8
Bridging the Semantic Gap in Multimedia Information Retrieval: Top-down and Bottom-up approaches
200643
9 200230
10 200825
11 200621
12 200519
13 200716
14
VIRAMI: visual information retrieval for archival moving imagery
200214
15 200214
16 200514
17 20019
18 19858
19 20006
20 19906

About Peter Enser

Peter Enser is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Molecular Biology, Conservation, Library and Information Sciences and Geology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 940 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (21 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (19 papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (11 papers), Multimodal Machine Learning Applications (3 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (2 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (2 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (2 papers) and Legal Education and Practice Innovations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (785 citations), Library and Information Sciences (19 citations), Museology (33 citations), Signal Processing (76 citations) and Media Technology (45 citations). Peter Enser has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Christine J. Sandom, Paul Lewis, Jonathon Hare, Kirk Martinez and Patrick Sinclair. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Information Science, Journal of Documentation, Libri, Program electronic library and information systems and International Journal of Information Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact