Peter E. Stokes

402 citations
13 papers · 343 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Peter E. Stokes

13 papers receiving 276 citations

Peers

Peter E. Stokes
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 34
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 191
  • Biological Psychiatry 8
  • Pharmacology 89
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 26
Replace Mark D. Beale with:
Mark D. Beale United States
Stephen T.H. Sokolov Canada
Larry S. Potter United States
Jacques Vital-Herne United States
Christopher B. Kelly United Kingdom
CHRISTIAAN D. VAN DER VELDE United States
Peggy E. Hayes United States
Olubanke Olofinjana United Kingdom
Daniel Grupper Israel
P. T. S. Milln United Kingdom
Peter E. Stokes relative to Mark D. Beale United States Mark D. Beale's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Mark D. Beale · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter E. Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter E. Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter E. Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter E. Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter E. Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter E. Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter E. Stokes. The network helps show where Peter E. Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter E. Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter E. Stokes Line = papers co-authored together Peter E. Stokes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1971150
2 198475
3 199043
4 199422
5 198519
6 198015
7 19905
8
High-dose lithium therapy.
19784
9 19773
10 19842
11 19862
12
Safety and efficacy of paroxetine in elderly patients.
19932
13 19841

About Peter E. Stokes

Peter E. Stokes is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Behavioral Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (6 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (1 paper), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (1 paper) and Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (34 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (191 citations), Biological Psychiatry (8 citations), Pharmacology (89 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (26 citations). Peter E. Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Charles A. Shamoian, Stephen H. Koslow, James W. Maas, Charles L. Bowden, John M. Davis, Robert D. Gibbons, Eli Robins, Alan C. Swann, Jack L. Croughan and Steven K. Secunda. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Clinical Neuropharmacology, The Lancet, Journal of Psychiatric Research and Hormone and Metabolic Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact