Peter Dreischer

948 citations
11 papers · 823 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Dreischer

11 papers receiving 813 citations

Peers

Peter Dreischer
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Physiology 635
  • Physiology 62
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 255
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 148
  • Genetics 47
Replace Kerstin Eisele with:
Kerstin Eisele Germany
Gianfranco Gaetani Italy
Evgeny Zemskov United States
Marios-Angelos Mouratis Greece
Elizabeth Rubin United States
Giuseppe Miscio Italy
Shilu Luo China
Pablo J. Giraudi Italy
Xinxu Yuan United States
Laura Bonaccini Italy
Peter Dreischer relative to Kerstin Eisele Germany Kerstin Eisele's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Kerstin Eisele · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Dreischer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Dreischer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Dreischer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Dreischer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Dreischer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Dreischer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Dreischer. The network helps show where Peter Dreischer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Dreischer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Dreischer Line = papers co-authored together Peter Dreischer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2006284
2 2012135
3 200699
4 201374
5 202253
6 200849
7 200642
8 201637
9 202017
10 202017
11 201716

About Peter Dreischer

Peter Dreischer is a scholar working on Physiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology and Immunology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 823 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (9 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (7 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (4 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (1 paper), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (1 paper), Ginseng Biological Effects and Applications (1 paper), Herbal Medicine Research Studies (1 paper) and Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (635 citations), Physiology (62 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (255 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (148 citations) and Genetics (47 citations). Peter Dreischer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Wieder, Florian Läng, Michael Duszenko, Ahmad Akel, Philipp A. Lang, Daniela S. Kempe, Martin Köberle, Erich Gulbins, Mehrdad Ghashghaeinia and Mahmoud Toulany. Their work appears in journals such as Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, British Journal of Haematology, Journal of Molecular Medicine, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact