Peter Doyle

563 citations
26 papers · 353 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Doyle

22 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers

Peter Doyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Clinical Psychology 173
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 65
  • Economics and Econometrics 104
  • Pharmacy 16
  • Finance 36
Replace Milo Keynes with:
Milo Keynes United Kingdom
Allan Young Canada
Stephanie Wallace United Kingdom
Setareh Ranjbar Switzerland
Kentaro Fukumoto Japan
Duc Quang Tran United States
Roy Porter
Benjamin Collins Canada
Matthew Davies Australia
Richard M. Smith United States
Peter Doyle relative to Milo Keynes United Kingdom Milo Keynes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.4×
Milo Keynes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Doyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Doyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Doyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Doyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Doyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Doyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Doyle. The network helps show where Peter Doyle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Doyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Doyle Line = papers co-authored together Peter Doyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201195
2 200836
3 201236
4 200134
5 200027
6 199825
7
Unlocking the Stratigraphical Record
199823
8 201016
9
Into the EU: Policy Frameworks in Central Europe
200211
10 200110
11 20098
12 19994
13 19964
14
Inflation: selected readings
19694
15 19983
16
Massive Open Online Courses - Will They Create Greater Opportunity Or Inequality?
20143
17 19733
18 19992
19 20002
20
Amaze Your Friends
19982

About Peter Doyle

Peter Doyle is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Clinical Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, Finance and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 26 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Growth and Productivity (6 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (4 papers), Global trade and economics (3 papers), Regional Development and Policy (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (1 paper) and Russia and Soviet political economy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (173 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (65 citations), Economics and Econometrics (104 citations), Pharmacy (16 citations) and Finance (36 citations). Peter Doyle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Le Grange, Peter Christoffersen, Angela Celio Doyle, Rebecka Peebles, James Lock, Alison Darcy, Ross D. Crosby, Louis Kuijs, Eunice Chen and Stephen A. Wonderlich. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Eating Disorders, Lethaia, Journal of Psychiatric Research, Economics of Transition and Palaios.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact