James Mitchell

28 papers receiving 622 citations

Peers

James Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Clinical Psychology 371
  • Applied Psychology 59
  • Radiation 95
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 102
  • Cancer Research 71
Replace Tsung‐Min Hung with:
Tsung‐Min Hung Taiwan
Sarah Williamson United States
Dina Tell United States
Jessica Murphy Canada
Peter Link United States
Alison Scope United Kingdom
Valentina Tesio Italy
Kate Lifford United Kingdom
Grégory Katz Israel
Tierney K. Lorenz United States
James Mitchell relative to Tsung‐Min Hung Taiwan Tsung‐Min Hung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Tsung‐Min Hung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Mitchell. The network helps show where James Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together James Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005237
2 200145
3 200742
4 201234
5 200934
6 200133
7 200426
8 201624
9 202024
10 202018
11 199517
12 201415
13 202015
14 201013
15 199510
16 20079
17 19839
18 20038
19 20208
20 19897

About James Mitchell

James Mitchell is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiation, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 31 papers that have together received 651 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (8 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (5 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (3 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (3 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (2 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (371 citations), Applied Psychology (59 citations), Radiation (95 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (102 citations) and Cancer Research (71 citations). James Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Scott J. Crow, W. Stewart Agras, Katherine A. Halmi, Helena C. Kraemer, Susan W. Bryson, G. Terence Wilson, J. Keith DeWyngaert, Silvia C. Formenti, Stephen A. Wonderlich and Ross D. Crosby. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, International Journal of Eating Disorders, Journal of Psychiatric Research, The American Surgeon and Eating Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact