James Mitchell

30 papers receiving 661 citations

Peers

James Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Clinical Psychology 386
  • Applied Psychology 39
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 71
  • Cancer Research 65
  • Radiation 39
Replace Dina Tell with:
Dina Tell United States
Jessica Murphy Canada
Michael Kahan United States
Alison Scope United Kingdom
Tsung‐Min Hung Taiwan
Reiner W. Dahlbender Germany
Daniele Masala Italy
Daniel D. Storch United States
Hubert Lacey United Kingdom
Lucas Lim Singapore
James Mitchell relative to Dina Tell United States Dina Tell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Dina Tell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Mitchell. The network helps show where James Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together James Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005251
2 200148
3 200744
4 201236
5 200135
6 200935
7 200433
8 202025
9 201624
10 202020
11 199517
12 202017
13 201416
14 201013
15 199512
16 200711
17 202010
18 198310
19 20038
20 20147

About James Mitchell

James Mitchell is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiation, Surgery and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 704 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (9 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (5 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (2 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (2 papers) and Radiation Dose and Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (386 citations), Applied Psychology (39 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (71 citations), Cancer Research (65 citations) and Radiation (39 citations). James Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Scott J. Crow, W. Stewart Agras, Susan W. Bryson, G. Terence Wilson, Helena C. Kraemer, Katherine A. Halmi, J. Keith DeWyngaert, Silvia C. Formenti, Stephen A. Wonderlich and Ross D. Crosby. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, International Journal of Eating Disorders, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Frontiers in Psychology and Pharmaceutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact