Peter Delius

1.9k citations
59 papers · 890 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Delius

53 papers receiving 704 citations

Peers

Peter Delius
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Archeology 85
  • Anthropology 270
  • Law 150
  • Sociology and Political Science 556
  • Soil Science 65
Replace Marcia Wright with:
Marcia Wright United States
Leslie Bank South Africa
Leroy Vail Zambia
Charles van Onselen South Africa
Saul Dubow United Kingdom
I. Schapera United Kingdom
Joan Vincent United States
W. D. Hammond‐Tooke South Africa
Todd Sanders United Kingdom
Cherryl Walker South Africa
Peter Delius relative to Marcia Wright United States Marcia Wright's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Marcia Wright · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Delius

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Delius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Delius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Delius more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Delius

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Delius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Delius. The network helps show where Peter Delius may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Delius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Delius Line = papers co-authored together Peter Delius links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002106
2 1987100
3
A Lion Amongst the Cattle: Reconstruction and Resistance in the Northern Transvaal
199699
4 198580
5 202147
6 200536
7 199731
8 198929
9 199027
10 200223
11 201423
12 200423
13
Islam: Art and Architecture
201323
14 198222
15 201216
16 200114
17 199714
18
Revisiting Bokoni: populating the stone ruins of the Mpumalanga Escarpment
200814
19 199713
20 200013

About Peter Delius

Peter Delius is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Law, Archeology and General Health Professions, having authored 59 papers that have together received 890 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include South African History and Culture (24 papers), African history and culture studies (9 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (9 papers), Archaeology and Rock Art Studies (7 papers), African studies and sociopolitical issues (6 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (6 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers) and Land Rights and Reforms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (85 citations), Anthropology (270 citations), Law (150 citations), Sociology and Political Science (556 citations) and Soil Science (65 citations). Peter Delius has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Clive Glaser, William Beinart, Patrick Harries, Stanley Trapido, Leonard Leslie Bessant, Maria H. Schoeman, Belinda Bozzoli, Liz Walker, Tim Maggs and Philip Bonner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Southern African Studies, African Studies, The International Journal of African Historical Studies, The Journal of African History and South African Historical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact