Peter de Vries

127 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Peter de Vries
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
  • Music 193
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 699
  • Applied Psychology 126
  • Sensory Systems 108
  • Social Psychology 461
Replace Eun Joo Kim with:
Eun Joo Kim South Korea
Frank Schmidt Germany
Hiroshi Azuma Japan
Robert A. Miller United States
James E. Porter United States
John Elliott United Kingdom
Rth Ho Hong Kong
David B. Flora Canada
Monica Lee United States
Richard A. King United States
Peter de Vries relative to Eun Joo Kim South Korea Eun Joo Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.1×
Eun Joo Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter de Vries

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter de Vries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter de Vries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter de Vries more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter de Vries

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter de Vries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter de Vries. The network helps show where Peter de Vries may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter de Vries, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter de Vries Line = papers co-authored together Peter de Vries links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 139 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000430
2 2003185
3 2001161
4 2010110
5 2002109
6 2001109
7 2009100
8 200396
9 200684
10 201281
11 199878
12 200470
13
Standards and quality in higher education
199759
14
Antitumor activity of lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase-beta inhibitors, a novel class of agents, in multiple myeloma.
200358
15 199958
16 201155
17 200052
18 200952
19 199649
20 201348

About Peter de Vries

Peter de Vries is a scholar working on Music, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 139 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diverse Music Education Insights (18 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (14 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (12 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (7 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (6 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (193 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (699 citations), Applied Psychology (126 citations), Sensory Systems (108 citations) and Social Psychology (461 citations). Peter de Vries has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Pramod R. Saxena, Carlos M. Villalón, Peer Tfelt‐Hansen, Henk Aarts, Jan P.C. Heiligers, Cees Midden, D.G. Bouwhuis, Thomas J. L. van Rompay, Ap Dijksterhuis and Jack W. Singer. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Pharmacology, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology, European Journal of Pharmacology, Music Education Research and Environment and Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact