Peter Dannenberg
Impact in
-
- Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
-
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Papers in
-
- Global trade, sustainability, and social impact 14
-
- Innovation and Socioeconomic Development 15
- Co-authors
- Martina Fuchs (7 shared papers)Tim Riedler (4 shared papers)Alexander Follmann (10 shared papers)Tobias Kuemmerle (1 shared paper)Daniel Schiller (3 shared papers)Javier Revilla Diez (5 shared papers)Tobia Lakes (1 shared paper)Kim Philip Schumacher (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Peter Dannenberg
55 papers receiving 896 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Business and International Management 112
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 183
- Marketing 124
- Urban Studies 72
- Strategy and Management 155
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Dannenberg
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Dannenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Dannenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Dannenberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Dannenberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Dannenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Dannenberg. The network helps show where Peter Dannenberg may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Dannenberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 246 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 113 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 21 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 14 |
About Peter Dannenberg
Peter Dannenberg is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Business and International Management, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 61 papers that have together received 940 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (15 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (14 papers), International Development and Aid (8 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (7 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (7 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (6 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (5 papers) and China's Global Influence and Migration (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (112 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (183 citations), Marketing (124 citations), Urban Studies (72 citations) and Strategy and Management (155 citations). Peter Dannenberg has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Kenya and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Martina Fuchs, Tim Riedler, Alexander Follmann, Tobias Kuemmerle, Daniel Schiller, Javier Revilla Diez, Tobia Lakes, Kim Philip Schumacher, Franziska Sielker and Patience Mshenga. Their work appears in journals such as Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, Journal of Maps, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Applied Geography and The Professional Geographer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.