Daniel Schiller

51 papers receiving 681 citations

Peers

Daniel Schiller
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 239
  • Business and International Management 52
  • Strategy and Management 302
  • Economics and Econometrics 227
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 66
Replace Göran Lindqvist with:
Göran Lindqvist Sweden
Annalisa Caloffi Italy
Patrizio Bianchi Italy
Helena Maria Martins Lastres Brazil
Eirik Vatne Norway
Kaoru Nabeshima Japan
Heidi Wiig Aslesen Norway
Ernest Miguélez Spain
Sandrine Labory Italy
Mari José Aranguren Spain
Daniel Schiller relative to Göran Lindqvist Sweden Göran Lindqvist's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.9×
Göran Lindqvist · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Schiller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Schiller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Schiller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Schiller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Schiller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Schiller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Schiller. The network helps show where Daniel Schiller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Schiller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Schiller Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Schiller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201280
2 200865
3 200656
4 200945
5 201833
6 200832
7 201129
8 200629
9 201028
10 200624
11 200924
12 200924
13 201122
14 201222
15 201621
16 201319
17 202119
18 201515
19 201514
20 202111

About Daniel Schiller

Daniel Schiller is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 57 papers that have together received 744 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (12 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (12 papers), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (9 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (8 papers), Global trade and economics (7 papers), Economic Zones and Regional Development (6 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (6 papers) and Innovation Policy and R&D (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (239 citations), Business and International Management (52 citations), Strategy and Management (302 citations), Economics and Econometrics (227 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (66 citations). Daniel Schiller has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Javier Revilla Diez, Ingo Liefner, Henning Kroll, Peter Dannenberg, Patarapong Intarakumnerd, Susanne Meyer, Keun Lee, Verena Radinger-Peer, Martijn Burger and Thomas Stahlecker. Their work appears in journals such as ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, European Planning Studies, Regional Studies, Applied Geography and Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact