Peter D. Watson

476 citations
10 papers · 309 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Peter D. Watson

10 papers receiving 281 citations

Peers

Peter D. Watson
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Clinical Psychology 194
  • Applied Psychology 29
  • Speech and Hearing 33
  • Social Psychology 79
  • General Health Professions 84
Replace Bret Hart with:
Bret Hart Australia
Cynthia G. Ayres United States
Christine Ferron France
Heddy Kovach Clark United States
Jody Resko United States
Melissa A. Cortina United Kingdom
S.A.F.M. van Dorsselaer Netherlands
Amie Pollack United States
J. Lynn Taylor United States
Bonita Stanton United States
Peter D. Watson relative to Bret Hart Australia Bret Hart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Bret Hart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter D. Watson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter D. Watson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter D. Watson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter D. Watson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter D. Watson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter D. Watson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter D. Watson. The network helps show where Peter D. Watson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Peter D. Watson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter D. Watson Line = papers co-authored together Peter D. Watson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 200788
2 201161
3 200155
4 200847
5 200531
6 19567
7 20056
8 20086
9
"JUST ACCEPT US HOW WE ARE MORE": EXPERIENCES OF YOUNG PA - KEHA - WITH THEIR FAMILIES IN AOTEAROA NEW ZEALAND
20065
10 19573

About Peter D. Watson

Peter D. Watson is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers), Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (2 papers), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (2 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (1 paper) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (194 citations), Applied Psychology (29 citations), Speech and Hearing (33 citations), Social Psychology (79 citations) and General Health Professions (84 citations). Peter D. Watson has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sally Merry, Elizabeth Robinson, Simon Denny, Theresa Fleming, Shanthi Ameratunga, Sue Crengle, Lyndon Walker, Jennifer Utter, Elizabeth J. Robinson and David Schaaf. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, Journal of Adolescent Health, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health and BMC Research Notes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact