Peter D. Spear

2.5k citations
53 papers · 2.0k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Peter D. Spear

53 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Peter D. Spear
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.3k
  • Ophthalmology 400
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 740
  • Sensory Systems 101
  • Neurology 132
Replace V. A. Casagrande with:
V. A. Casagrande United States
Richard C. Van Sluyters United States
K.J. Sanderson Australia
P. D. Spear United States
Kao Liang Chow United States
C. Distler Germany
Mark W. Dubin United States
Vivien A. Casagrande United States
K.-P. Hoffmann Germany
Takuji Kasamatsu United States
Peter D. Spear relative to V. A. Casagrande United States V. A. Casagrande's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
V. A. Casagrande · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter D. Spear

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter D. Spear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter D. Spear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter D. Spear more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter D. Spear

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter D. Spear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter D. Spear. The network helps show where Peter D. Spear may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter D. Spear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter D. Spear Line = papers co-authored together Peter D. Spear links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993313
2 2001145
3 1977138
4 1993117
5 197384
6 198177
7 198274
8 197366
9 197663
10 196960
11 199658
12 198254
13 197449
14 197446
15 197239
16 199737
17 197837
18 197736
19 198434
20 198332

About Peter D. Spear

Peter D. Spear is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Sensory Systems, having authored 53 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (36 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (25 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (19 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (14 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (6 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (5 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.3k citations), Ophthalmology (400 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (740 citations), Sensory Systems (101 citations) and Neurology (132 citations). Peter D. Spear has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lillian Tong, J. Jay Braun, Kenneth E. Kratz, Aneeq Ahmad, Kao Liang Chow, Ronald E. Kalil, Theresa E. Hickey, Charles Cresson Wood, Robert A. Schumer and S. Murray Sherman. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Visual Neuroscience, Experimental Neurology and Developmental Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact