Peter D. Dacre

762 citations
28 papers · 688 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Peter D. Dacre

28 papers receiving 648 citations

Peers

Peter D. Dacre
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 602
  • Spectroscopy 280
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 86
  • Atmospheric Science 140
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 5
Replace Frank P. Billingsley with:
Frank P. Billingsley United States
T. E. H. Walker United States
W. Meier Germany
N. James Bridge United Kingdom
Atri Mukhopadhyay India
Lynn T. Redmon United States
Helena Larsen Denmark
Frank W. Bobrowicz United States
R. M. Berns Netherlands
R. Polák Czechia
Peter D. Dacre relative to Frank P. Billingsley United States Frank P. Billingsley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Frank P. Billingsley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter D. Dacre

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter D. Dacre's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter D. Dacre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter D. Dacre more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter D. Dacre

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter D. Dacre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter D. Dacre. The network helps show where Peter D. Dacre may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Peter D. Dacre, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter D. Dacre Line = papers co-authored together Peter D. Dacre links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197875
2 197074
3 198265
4 198257
5 198254
6 197041
7 198238
8 197931
9 197730
10 198429
11 198127
12 198220
13 197120
14 197518
15 197615
16 197414
17 197213
18 198413
19 196910
20 19819

About Peter D. Dacre

Peter D. Dacre is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 28 papers that have together received 688 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (16 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (11 papers), Nonlinear Optical Materials Research (7 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (4 papers), X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (4 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (3 papers) and Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (602 citations), Spectroscopy (280 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (86 citations), Atmospheric Science (140 citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (5 citations). Peter D. Dacre has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Lothar Frommhold, R. McWeeny, M. Elder, G.R.J. Williams, D. P. Craig, B. SOLOUKI, Hans Bock, P. Rosmus, Raymond Daudel and C. Valdemoro. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Physics, Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, Chemical Physics Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics and International Journal of Quantum Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact