Peter Cudd

36 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

Peter Cudd
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Occupational Therapy 30
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 17
  • Human-Computer Interaction 31
  • Applied Psychology 22
  • General Health Professions 104
Replace Elio Carchietti with:
Elio Carchietti Italy
Pamela G. Forducey United States
Kyoko Osaka Japan
Ahmed Al‐Hindawi United Kingdom
Annika Reinersmann Netherlands
Simon Bo Larsen Denmark
Mohammed Tahri Sqalli Qatar
Ana Londral Portugal
Stephen Czarnuch Canada
Peter Cudd relative to Elio Carchietti Italy Elio Carchietti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.4×
Elio Carchietti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Cudd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Cudd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Cudd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Cudd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Cudd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Cudd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Cudd. The network helps show where Peter Cudd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Cudd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Cudd Line = papers co-authored together Peter Cudd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012121
2 201626
3 202019
4 199219
5 199213
6 199613
7 198612
8
Microwave field predictions in layered tissue effect on radiometer measurements
19858
9 20187
10 20127
11 19886
12 19946
13 20154
14 19864
15 19964
16 19924
17 20223
18
Seeing through the eyes of the citizens during emergencies
20162
19 19962
20 19872

About Peter Cudd

Peter Cudd is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, General Health Professions, Biomedical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 36 papers that have together received 300 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (8 papers), Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (4 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (4 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (3 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (3 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (3 papers), Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission (3 papers) and Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (30 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (17 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (31 citations), Applied Psychology (22 citations) and General Health Professions (104 citations). Peter Cudd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Mark Hawley, Chris Littlewood, Paul Bissell, Helen Buckley Woods, F.A. Benson, J. Conway, A.P. Anderson, Jennifer Read, Steven Blackburn and Natalie Jones. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Electronics Letters, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Microwave and Optical Technology Letters and Obesity Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact