Peter C. Link

1.2k citations
22 papers · 972 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Peter C. Link

20 papers receiving 924 citations

Peers

Peter C. Link
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 622
  • Applied Psychology 182
  • Family Practice 33
  • General Health Professions 135
  • Clinical Psychology 98
Replace Dimitri Perivoliotis with:
Dimitri Perivoliotis United States
Anton B. P. Staring Netherlands
Stephanie Moor New Zealand
Natalie J. Maples United States
Sonja Copestake United Kingdom
Simone Holley United Kingdom
Bill Jerrom United Kingdom
Rodney Elgie United Kingdom
Zhimin He United Kingdom
M. Gervin Ireland
Peter C. Link relative to Dimitri Perivoliotis United States Dimitri Perivoliotis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.3×
Dimitri Perivoliotis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter C. Link

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter C. Link's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter C. Link with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter C. Link more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter C. Link

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter C. Link. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter C. Link. The network helps show where Peter C. Link may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter C. Link, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter C. Link Line = papers co-authored together Peter C. Link links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011259
2 2014124
3 2013105
4 201994
5 200788
6 200955
7 200847
8 201538
9 201033
10 202026
11 201524
12 200919
13 202018
14 201817
15 202010
16 20106
17 20114
18 20122
19 20232
20 20251

About Peter C. Link

Peter C. Link is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 972 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (18 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (1 paper) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (622 citations), Applied Psychology (182 citations), Family Practice (33 citations), General Health Professions (135 citations) and Clinical Psychology (98 citations). Peter C. Link has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Eric L. Granholm, Jason L. Holden, John R. McQuaid, Dror Ben‐Zeev, Dilip V. Jeste, Thomas L. Patterson, Colin A. Depp, Tanya Mikhael, Scott C. Fish and Joel David Swendsen. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Bulletin, Schizophrenia Research, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Neuropsychology and American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact