Peter C. Kjærgaard

460 citations
29 papers · 293 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter C. Kjærgaard

28 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers

Peter C. Kjærgaard
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • History and Philosophy of Science 73
  • Anthropology 81
  • Paleontology 57
  • Ecological Modeling 11
  • Archeology 26
Replace William Stanton with:
William Stanton United States
Paul Edward Dutton New Zealand
Jane P. Davidson United States
Irina Podgorny Argentina
Jacob W. Gruber United States
Marc R. Meyer United States
Charles Bonnet France
Lydia T. Black United States
John Darwent United States
Pierre Pellegrin United States
Peter C. Kjærgaard relative to William Stanton United States William Stanton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.3×
William Stanton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter C. Kjærgaard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter C. Kjærgaard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter C. Kjærgaard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter C. Kjærgaard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter C. Kjærgaard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter C. Kjærgaard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter C. Kjærgaard. The network helps show where Peter C. Kjærgaard may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter C. Kjærgaard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter C. Kjærgaard Line = papers co-authored together Peter C. Kjærgaard links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201648
2 201642
3 201528
4 201623
5 201320
6 201215
7 201113
8 201213
9 200912
10 20139
11 20158
12 20128
13 20026
14 20106
15 20026
16
Science in Denmark: A Thousand-Year History
20086
17 20165
18 20144
19 20254
20 20094

About Peter C. Kjærgaard

Peter C. Kjærgaard is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology, Genetics, Social Psychology and Paleontology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Natural History (5 papers), Evolution and Science Education (5 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (4 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (3 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (3 papers), Australian Indigenous Culture and History (3 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (2 papers) and Race, Genetics, and Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (73 citations), Anthropology (81 citations), Paleontology (57 citations), Ecological Modeling (11 citations) and Archeology (26 citations). Peter C. Kjærgaard has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Felix Riede, Jens‐Christian Svenning, Thomas Mailund, Trine Kellberg Nielsen, Brody Sandel, Blas M. Benito, Stefaan Blancke, Luseadra McKerracher, Graciela Gil‐Romera and Johan Braeckman. Their work appears in journals such as Isis, Centaurus, Studia Theologica - Nordic Journal of Theology, Quaternary International and History of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact