William Stanton
Impact in
Papers in
-
- History of Science and Natural History 2
- Ecology 2
- Polar Research and Ecology 2
- Co-authors
- Ashley Montagu (1 shared paper)David F. Long (1 shared paper)Christina L. Kwapich (1 shared paper)Wälter R. Tschinkel (1 shared paper)W.J. Rink (1 shared paper)James S. Dunbar (1 shared paper)Hamilton Cravens (1 shared paper)Éric Brian (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of American History (3 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)The Journal of Southern History (1 paper)Journal of Archaeological Science (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
William Stanton
10 papers receiving 197 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- History and Philosophy of Science 31
- General Psychology 6
- Anthropology 39
- Paleontology 24
- History 34
Countries citing papers authored by William Stanton
This map shows the geographic impact of William Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Stanton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Stanton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Stanton. The network helps show where William Stanton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside William Stanton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1960 | 120 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 61 | |
| 3 | 1976 | 36 | |
| 4 | The leopard's spots | 1960 | 22 |
| 5 | 1964 | 22 | |
| 6 | 1979 | 15 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1976 | 10 | |
| 9 | The Rapid Growth of Human Populations 1750-2000: Histories, Consequences, Issues, Nation by Nation | 2004 | 3 |
| 10 | The Triad Society Or, Heaven And Earth Association | 2007 | 3 |
| 11 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 0 |
About William Stanton
William Stanton is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Ecology, Archeology, Political Science and International Relations and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polar Research and Ecology (2 papers), History of Science and Natural History (2 papers), Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (2 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (1 paper), Plant and animal studies (1 paper), Theatre and Performance Studies (1 paper), Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender (1 paper) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (31 citations), General Psychology (6 citations), Anthropology (39 citations), Paleontology (24 citations) and History (34 citations). William Stanton has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ashley Montagu, David F. Long, Christina L. Kwapich, Wälter R. Tschinkel, W.J. Rink, James S. Dunbar, Hamilton Cravens and Éric Brian. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, The American Historical Review, The Journal of Southern History, Journal of Archaeological Science and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.