Peter C. Kind

14.1k citations
116 papers · 3.4k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Peter C. Kind

107 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Peter C. Kind
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Developmental Neuroscience 436
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.5k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.3k
  • Genetics 1.1k
  • Cell Biology 394
Replace Zhanyan Fu with:
Zhanyan Fu United States
Vitaly A. Klyachko United States
Pavel V. Belichenko United States
Marc V. Fuccillo United States
Kevin M. Woolfrey United States
Tetsuo Yamamori Japan
J. Tiago Gonçalves United States
Daisuke Hattori United States
Caiying Guo United States
Elizabeth J. Hong United States
Peter C. Kind relative to Zhanyan Fu United States Zhanyan Fu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Zhanyan Fu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter C. Kind

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter C. Kind's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter C. Kind with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter C. Kind more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter C. Kind

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter C. Kind. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter C. Kind. The network helps show where Peter C. Kind may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter C. Kind, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter C. Kind Line = papers co-authored together Peter C. Kind links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 116 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012205
2 2010199
3 2001188
4 1997178
5 2001165
6 2012150
7 2002118
8 1994104
9 201579
10 201274
11 200270
12 201668
13 200866
14 201765
15 201565
16 201663
17 201262
18 200955
19 201955
20 201453

About Peter C. Kind

Peter C. Kind is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 116 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (35 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (31 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (19 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (17 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (10 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (8 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (8 papers) and Congenital heart defects research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (436 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.5k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.3k citations), Genetics (1.1k citations) and Cell Biology (394 citations). Peter C. Kind has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Frank Sengpiel, Lasani S. Wijetunge, Colin Blakemore, David J. A. Wyllie, Reha S. Erzurumlu, Sally M. Till, Giles E. Hardingham, Donald E. Mitchell, Susan Hockfield and Mark F. Bear. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Molecular Autism, Cell Reports, European Journal of Neuroscience and Journal of Instrumentation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact