Ines Blockx
Impact in
-
- Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- MRI in cancer diagnosis
Papers in
-
- Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications 7
- Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications 4
-
- Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases 4
- Co-authors
- Marleen Verhoye (15 shared papers)Annemie Van der Linden (15 shared papers)Jan Sijbers (6 shared papers)Jelle Veraart (4 shared papers)Dirk H. J. Poot (2 shared papers)Wim Van Hecke (3 shared papers)Nadja Van Camp (3 shared papers)Johan Van Audekerke (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- NeuroImage (5 papers)Neurobiology of Aging (1 paper)Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (1 paper)Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (1 paper)Neuroscience (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Ines Blockx
16 papers receiving 727 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 411
- Computational Mathematics 6
- Neurology 131
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 67
- Cognitive Neuroscience 144
Countries citing papers authored by Ines Blockx
This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Blockx's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Blockx with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Blockx more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Blockx
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Blockx. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Blockx. The network helps show where Ines Blockx may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ines Blockx, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 193 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 134 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 59 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 46 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 34 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 29 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 26 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 22 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 0 |
About Ines Blockx
Ines Blockx is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 730 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers) and Connective tissue disorders research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (411 citations), Computational Mathematics (6 citations), Neurology (131 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (67 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (144 citations). Ines Blockx has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Marleen Verhoye, Annemie Van der Linden, Jan Sijbers, Jelle Veraart, Dirk H. J. Poot, Wim Van Hecke, Nadja Van Camp, Johan Van Audekerke, Kerstin Raber and Elisabeth Jonckers. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Neurobiology of Aging, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.