Peter C. Herman
Impact in
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- Joseph Conrad and Literature
-
- Medieval Literature and History
Papers in
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 3
- Joseph Conrad and Literature 2
- Classics 5
- Medieval Literature and History 3
- Renaissance Literature and Culture 2
- Co-authors
- Karen Newman (1 shared paper)Sander L. Gilman (1 shared paper)John Michael (1 shared paper)Michael A. Dubson (1 shared paper)Elizabeth M. Sauer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Renaissance Quarterly (4 papers)Milton Quarterly (1 paper)Criticism (1 paper)Exemplaria (1 paper)Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Peter C. Herman
28 papers receiving 77 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Literature and Literary Theory 56
- Classics 14
- History 33
- Religious studies 12
- Philosophy 20
Countries citing papers authored by Peter C. Herman
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter C. Herman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter C. Herman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter C. Herman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter C. Herman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter C. Herman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter C. Herman. The network helps show where Peter C. Herman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Peter C. Herman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 18 | |
| 2 | Squitter-wits and muse-haters : Sidney, Spenser, Milton, and Renaissance antipoetic sentiment | 1996 | 18 |
| 3 | 2005 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 7 | Day Late, Dollar Short: The Next Generation and the New Academy. | 2000 | 6 |
| 8 | 1997 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 16 | Approaches to Teaching Milton's Shorter Poetry and Prose | 2008 | 3 |
| 17 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 2 |
About Peter C. Herman
Peter C. Herman is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics, Anthropology, History and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 45 papers that have together received 143 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Literary Studies (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Medieval Literature and History (3 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (2 papers), Joseph Conrad and Literature (2 papers) and Renaissance Literature and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (56 citations), Classics (14 citations), History (33 citations), Religious studies (12 citations) and Philosophy (20 citations). Peter C. Herman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Karen Newman, Sander L. Gilman, John Michael, Michael A. Dubson and Elizabeth M. Sauer. Their work appears in journals such as Renaissance Quarterly, Milton Quarterly, Criticism, Exemplaria and Studies in English Literature 1500-1900.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.