Peter C. Herman

504 citations
36 papers · 135 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Peter C. Herman

26 papers receiving 71 citations

Peers

Peter C. Herman
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Literature and Literary Theory 49
  • Classics 15
  • History 39
  • Religious studies 13
  • Museology 9
Replace Sharon Achinstein with:
Sharon Achinstein United States
Cedric C. Brown United Kingdom
Nicholas McDowell United Kingdom
John Whale United Kingdom
Margaret P. Hannay United States
Laura Lunger Knoppers United States
Janel Mueller United States
Nicholas von Maltzahn Canada
Paula McDowell United States
Antonio Franceschetti United States
Peter C. Herman relative to Sharon Achinstein United States Sharon Achinstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Sharon Achinstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter C. Herman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter C. Herman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter C. Herman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter C. Herman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter C. Herman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter C. Herman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter C. Herman. The network helps show where Peter C. Herman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Peter C. Herman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter C. Herman Line = papers co-authored together Peter C. Herman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199825
2
Squitter-wits and muse-haters : Sidney, Spenser, Milton, and Renaissance antipoetic sentiment
199613
3 200513
4 201212
5 200512
6 20027
7
Day Late, Dollar Short: The Next Generation and the New Academy.
20006
8 20185
9 19974
10 20093
11 20083
12 20113
13 20013
14 20103
15 20013
16 20032
17 20152
18 20002
19
Approaches to Teaching Milton's Shorter Poetry and Prose
20082
20 20142

About Peter C. Herman

Peter C. Herman is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Classics, Anthropology and History, having authored 36 papers that have together received 135 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Literary Studies (4 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), Medieval Literature and History (3 papers), Joseph Conrad and Literature (2 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers) and Renaissance Literature and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (49 citations), Classics (15 citations), History (39 citations), Religious studies (13 citations) and Museology (9 citations). Peter C. Herman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Karen Newman, Sander L. Gilman, Richard Strier, Elizabeth Sauer, Joseph Wittreich, John Michael, Michael Dubson and John Rogers. Their work appears in journals such as Renaissance Quarterly, Milton Quarterly, Literature Compass, College English and Exemplaria.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact