Nicholas Halmi

575 citations
23 papers · 70 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Nicholas Halmi

13 papers receiving 38 citations

Peers

Nicholas Halmi
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Literature and Literary Theory 35
  • Philosophy 15
  • History 13
  • History and Philosophy of Science 5
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 5
Replace Melvyn New with:
Melvyn New United States
Nicholas Saul United Kingdom
Pamela Clemit United Kingdom
Rüdiger Campe United States
Kelvin Everest United Kingdom
Gavin Alexander United Kingdom
Stephen B. Dobranski United States
Rebecca Bushnell United States
Anthony Trollope
W. B. Carnochan United States
Nicholas Halmi relative to Melvyn New United States Melvyn New's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Melvyn New · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Halmi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Halmi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Halmi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Halmi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Halmi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Halmi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Halmi. The network helps show where Nicholas Halmi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Halmi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Halmi Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Halmi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200328
2 200719
3
Coleridge's poetry and prose : authoritative texts, criticism
20043
4 19933
5 20102
6
Wordsworth's poetry and prose : authoritative texts, criticism
20142
7 20192
8 19922
9 19952
10 20102
11 20051
12 20151
13 19961
14 20041
15 20211
16 20180
17
Northrop Frye's fearful symmetry : a study of William Blake
20040
18 20130
19 20100
20 20180

About Nicholas Halmi

Nicholas Halmi is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 23 papers that have together received 70 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual Culture and Art Theory (2 papers), Short Stories in Global Literature (2 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (2 papers), Philippine History and Culture (2 papers), Moravian Church and William Blake (1 paper), Canadian Identity and History (1 paper), Decadence, Literature, and Society (1 paper) and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (35 citations), Philosophy (15 citations), History (13 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (5 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (5 citations). Nicholas Halmi has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Paul Magnuson, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, William Wordsworth, Northrop Frye, Richard T. Gray and Michael Rosenthal. Their work appears in journals such as European Romantic Review, Modern Language Quarterly, The Wordsworth Circle, Common Knowledge and Notes and Queries.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact