Peter C. Daniel

657 citations
35 papers · 564 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Peter C. Daniel

31 papers receiving 526 citations

Peers

Peter C. Daniel
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Sensory Systems 155
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 247
  • Aquatic Science 84
  • Insect Science 103
  • Ecology 199
Replace Rainer Voigt with:
Rainer Voigt United States
Tine Valentinĉic Slovenia
W. C. Michel United States
Martin Dambach Germany
Anuradha Batabyal Canada
Tamotsu TAMURA Japan
Rita Wallén Sweden
H. Nordeng Norway
Mary Crisp United Kingdom
William Stewart United States
Peter C. Daniel relative to Rainer Voigt United States Rainer Voigt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Rainer Voigt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter C. Daniel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter C. Daniel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter C. Daniel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter C. Daniel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter C. Daniel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter C. Daniel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter C. Daniel. The network helps show where Peter C. Daniel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter C. Daniel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter C. Daniel Line = papers co-authored together Peter C. Daniel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199153
2 201250
3 199142
4
Scaling the Unpleasantness of Sounds According to the BTL Model: Ratio-Scale Representation and Psychoacoustical Analysis
200433
5 198832
6 198831
7 198930
8 199730
9 199124
10 199623
11 200221
12 199418
13 198714
14 198713
15 198913
16 198913
17 201713
18 199112
19 198712
20 198711

About Peter C. Daniel

Peter C. Daniel is a scholar working on Ecology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Insect Science and Aquatic Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 564 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crustacean biology and ecology (14 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (12 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (8 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (8 papers), Marine and fisheries research (7 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (7 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (4 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (155 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (247 citations), Aquatic Science (84 citations), Insect Science (103 citations) and Ecology (199 citations). Peter C. Daniel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Charles D. Derby, Marie-Nadia Girardot, Robert C. Bayer, John C. Barbato, Wolfgang Ellermeier, Mihály Molnár, Enikő K. Magyari, Pál Sümegi, Michele Burgess and Michael W. Fox. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Senses, Physiology & Behavior, Fisheries Research, Hepatology and Journal of Chemical Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact