Peter Burridge

2.1k citations
31 papers · 1.3k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Burridge

30 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Peter Burridge
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 501
  • Economics and Econometrics 926
  • Finance 263
  • Strategy and Management 189
  • Statistics and Probability 59
Replace In-Moo Kim with:
In-Moo Kim South Korea
Boriss Siliverstovs Switzerland
László Mátyás Australia
Seung C. Ahn United States
Vassilis A. Hajivassiliou United States
Elias Tzavalis Greece
Giovanni Urga United Kingdom
Michael McAleer Australia
David N. DeJong United States
Allan P. Layton Australia
Peter Burridge relative to In-Moo Kim South Korea In-Moo Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
In-Moo Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Burridge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Burridge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Burridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Burridge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Burridge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Burridge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Burridge. The network helps show where Peter Burridge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Peter Burridge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Burridge Line = papers co-authored together Peter Burridge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002312
2 1980230
3 1981137
4 200057
5 201655
6 198150
7 200044
8 201044
9 200540
10 198436
11 200129
12 198528
13 201227
14 200626
15 198425
16 198822
17 200122
18 199921
19 199618
20 200415

About Peter Burridge

Peter Burridge is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance, Statistics and Probability and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (8 papers), Spatial and Panel Data Analysis (8 papers), Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (6 papers), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (5 papers), Housing Market and Economics (5 papers), Statistical and numerical algorithms (3 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (3 papers) and Market Dynamics and Volatility (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (501 citations), Economics and Econometrics (926 citations), Finance (263 citations), Strategy and Management (189 citations) and Statistics and Probability (59 citations). Peter Burridge has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Xiaohui Liu, P.J.N. Sinclair, Kenneth F. Wallis, Robert Taylor, Richard L. Gordon, B. Fingleton, Michael Theobald, Wojciech Charemza, Emmanuel Guerre and Michele Pistollato. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Econometrics, Spatial Economic Analysis, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Journal of the American Statistical Association and Regional Science and Urban Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact