Peter Brooks
Impact in
- Microbiology top 2%
- Insect Science top 1%
- Bee Products Chemical Analysis
- Insect and Pesticide Research
Papers in
-
- Bee Products Chemical Analysis 29
- Insect and Pesticide Research 19
- Co-authors
- Milena Fernandes (2 shared papers)Helen M. Wallace (16 shared papers)C. Flavia Massaro (7 shared papers)W.F. Smyth (7 shared papers)Fraser D. Russell (12 shared papers)Robert J. Seviour (4 shared papers)Miroslav Radman (4 shared papers)Dee Carter (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (7 papers)Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (5 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (3 papers)Energy Conversion and Management (2 papers)Planta Medica (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Peter Brooks
98 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
- Microbiology 37
- Insect Science 599
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 149
- Biochemistry 116
- Food Science 342
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Brooks
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Brooks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Brooks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Brooks. The network helps show where Peter Brooks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Brooks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 103 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 199 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 151 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 150 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 88 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 83 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 74 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 73 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 69 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 66 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 65 | |
| 11 | 1990 | 64 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 57 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 52 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 50 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 47 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 43 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 42 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 40 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 38 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 37 |
About Peter Brooks
Peter Brooks is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Food Science and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 103 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bee Products Chemical Analysis (29 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (19 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (19 papers), Plant and animal studies (12 papers), Biodiesel Production and Applications (8 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (7 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (6 papers) and Fatty Acid Research and Health (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (37 citations), Insect Science (599 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (149 citations), Biochemistry (116 citations) and Food Science (342 citations). Peter Brooks has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Milena Fernandes, Helen M. Wallace, C. Flavia Massaro, W.F. Smyth, Fraser D. Russell, Robert J. Seviour, Miroslav Radman, Dee Carter, Nural N. Cokcetin and Shona Blair. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Energy Conversion and Management and Planta Medica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.