Peter Branscombe
Impact in
- Music top 5%
- Musicology and Musical Analysis
- Diverse Musicological Studies
- Theater, Performance, and Music History
- Music History and Culture
Papers in
- Music 13
- Musicology and Musical Analysis 13
- Diverse Musicological Studies 2
-
- Historical Influence and Diplomacy 5
- Co-authors
- Eric Blom (1 shared paper)Otto Erich Deutsch (1 shared paper)Jeremy Noble (1 shared paper)Ewald Osers (1 shared paper)Mary Sue Morrow (1 shared paper)Richard Freedman (1 shared paper)John A. Rice (1 shared paper)Geoffrey F. Chew (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Modern Language Review (8 papers)Notes (5 papers)German History (3 papers)Early Music (1 paper)Forum for Modern Language Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter Branscombe
11 papers receiving 34 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Music 36
- Archeology 2
- General Arts and Humanities 1
- Cognitive Neuroscience 17
- Rehabilitation 6
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Branscombe
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Branscombe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Branscombe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Branscombe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Branscombe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Branscombe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Branscombe. The network helps show where Peter Branscombe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Peter Branscombe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1966 | 39 | |
| 2 | 1983 | 13 | |
| 3 | W.A. Mozart, die Zauberflöte | 1991 | 7 |
| 4 | 1977 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1965 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1971 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1978 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1971 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1981 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1978 | 0 |
About Peter Branscombe
Peter Branscombe is a scholar working on Music, Political Science and International Relations, Literature and Literary Theory, Classics and Cultural Studies, having authored 27 papers that have together received 82 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musicology and Musical Analysis (13 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (5 papers), German Literature and Culture Studies (5 papers), Arts, Culture, and Music Studies (2 papers), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (2 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (2 papers) and Balkan and Eastern European Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (36 citations), Archeology (2 citations), General Arts and Humanities (1 citation), Cognitive Neuroscience (17 citations) and Rehabilitation (6 citations). Peter Branscombe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Eric Blom, Otto Erich Deutsch, Jeremy Noble, Ewald Osers, Mary Sue Morrow, Richard Freedman, John A. Rice and Geoffrey F. Chew. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Notes, German History, Early Music and Forum for Modern Language Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.