Peter Booth
Impact in
- Safety Research top 5%
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Communication top 10%
- Social Media and Politics
Papers in
- Surgery 9
- Facial Trauma and Fracture Management 3
- Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques 2
-
- Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Taina Bucher (1 shared paper)Andrew N. Redington (2 shared papers)Michael L. Rigby (2 shared papers)Darryl F. Shore (1 shared paper)Sigrid Røyseng (2 shared papers)E A Shinebourne (1 shared paper)S. Cliff (2 shared papers)Luke Cascarini (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (8 papers)Heart (2 papers)Museum Management and Curatorship (2 papers)Business Ethics Quarterly (1 paper)Studies in Conservation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNorwayDenmark
In The Last Decade
Peter Booth
28 papers receiving 538 citations
Peter Booth's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Safety Research 83
- Communication 65
- Museology 29
- Oral Surgery 31
- Health Informatics 6
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Booth
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Booth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Booth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Booth. The network helps show where Peter Booth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | To be or not to be algorithm aware: a question of a new digital divide? Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 258 |
| 2 | 1990 | 75 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 10 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 3 |
About Peter Booth
Peter Booth is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Dermatology and Orthodontics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 592 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (3 papers), Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (3 papers), Cleft Lip and Palate Research (3 papers), Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (2 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (2 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (2 papers) and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (83 citations), Communication (65 citations), Museology (29 citations), Oral Surgery (31 citations) and Health Informatics (6 citations). Peter Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Taina Bucher, Andrew N. Redington, Michael L. Rigby, Darryl F. Shore, Sigrid Røyseng, E A Shinebourne, S. Cliff, Luke Cascarini, Darryl Coombes and Trilce Navarrete. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heart, Museum Management and Curatorship, Business Ethics Quarterly and Studies in Conservation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.