Peter Barr

54 papers receiving 950 citations

Peers

Peter Barr
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Research and Theory 12
  • Clinical Psychology 277
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 62
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 200
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 49
Replace Bert J. Smit with:
Bert J. Smit Netherlands
Anita Catlin United States
Maryalice Nocera United States
Gillian Colville United Kingdom
Sara Campagna Italy
Viveca Lindh Sweden
Li‐Min Wu Taiwan
Sally A. Webb United States
Walter M. Robinson United States
Mark R. Mercurio United States
Peter Barr relative to Bert J. Smit Netherlands Bert J. Smit's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Bert J. Smit · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Barr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Barr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Barr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Barr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Barr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Barr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Barr. The network helps show where Peter Barr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Barr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Barr Line = papers co-authored together Peter Barr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197781
2 200467
3 200362
4 200852
5 201850
6 199943
7 201741
8 200638
9 200535
10 200835
11 201133
12 198032
13 197330
14 197428
15 201026
16 200726
17 202025
18 199925
19 201123
20 202022

About Peter Barr

Peter Barr is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions and Epidemiology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (12 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (12 papers), Ethics in medical practice (5 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (4 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (4 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (3 papers) and Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (12 citations), Clinical Psychology (277 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (62 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (200 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (49 citations). Peter Barr has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Joanne Cacciatore, Kaye Spence, Kathryn Browning Carmo, James Sumners, George Cassady, John M. Celermajer, Rod W. Hunt, Nadia Badawi, Eileen D.M. Gallery and T. B. Cartmill. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Critical Care, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, Journal of Loss and Trauma, Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology and Archives of Disease in Childhood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact