Peter Barker

18 papers receiving 364 citations

Peers

Peter Barker
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 161
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 55
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 72
  • Statistics and Probability 25
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 8
Replace Kiang Liu with:
Kiang Liu United States
Martin H. Keppel Austria
Nasrin Mansournia Iran
Valentino Miconi Italy
Harsukh Dhillon United States
Matti Haavisto Finland
Seyed Masoom Masoompour Iran
Anitha Yelangi United States
Foss Op Norway
Shuang Huang United States
Peter Barker relative to Kiang Liu United States Kiang Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Kiang Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Barker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Barker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Barker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Barker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Barker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Barker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Barker. The network helps show where Peter Barker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Barker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Barker Line = papers co-authored together Peter Barker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2005241
2 200523
3 201022
4 200416
5 199515
6 201412
7 199610
8 20049
9 20049
10 20018
11
Case Studies in Cost-benefit Analysis
19756
12 20045
13 20144
14 19723
15 19853
16 20142
17 20212
18
The Management of Weeds in Irrigation and Drainage Channels
19971
19
Cost-based water prices
19970

About Peter Barker

Peter Barker is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Ocean Engineering, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Water resources management and optimization (2 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (2 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (1 paper) and Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (161 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (55 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (72 citations), Statistics and Probability (25 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (8 citations). Peter Barker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David Halsall, Elizabeth A. Warburton, Kenneth Poole, Collette Rose, J. Reeve, N. Loveridge, Robin Henderson, Rachel Cooper, Karen Slade and Michael Fahie‐Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Lifetime Data Analysis, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, The Medical Journal of Australia and Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact